Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 32
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 18, 2026.
Public comments (32)
Long-time resident and former downtown business district president said the project has been studied for decades and urged the commission to act, citing business and youth retention.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 2:21:43 →Chamber of Commerce chair-elect from Simi Valley voiced strong business-community support, citing economic vitality and gathering spaces.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 2:23:30 →Called the project's scale astonishing and said residents will face overcrowding and congestion while outside money profits.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 2:25:25 →Supported the project but suggested a pedestrian bridge across Thousand Oaks Boulevard to connect both sides.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 2:25:05 →Chamber boardmember and small business owner voiced support, citing championship, confidence, and community.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 2:29:31 →Los Robles Health System vice president voiced strong support, citing the need for affordable housing to retain healthcare workers.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 2:36:30 →Raised water supply, hospital bed capacity, heat island effects, and opposition to seven-story buildings.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 2:38:57 →Long-time resident supported the well-researched project and praised the city's outreach.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:16:30 →Resident since 1956 opposed the project, submitted a 109-signature petition, and cited tree removal, height, and traffic.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 2:41:38 →Resident since 1961 and Chamber boardmember supported the plan as the fulfillment of a decades-long vision.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 2:44:27 →Resident since 1974 and theater usher opposed, citing retail vacancies, existing traffic delays at shows, and the height precedent.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 2:46:34 →Third-generation commercial property manager supported the project for keeping businesses and young families in the community.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 2:54:05 →Cal Lutheran provost supported the project, highlighting the Hub 101 entrepreneurship incubator and graduate retention.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 2:57:33 →TO Arts executive director described the project as the missing arts 'R&D lab' for developing local artists.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 2:59:33 →Young resident who walked to the meeting strongly supported the project, preferring new buildings to the existing parking structure and citing housing affordability.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:01:30 →Chamber president/CEO presented a coalition of over 100 businesses and nonprofits supporting the project.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:03:37 →Young resident supported the project as a way to retain talented young people who currently leave the city.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:06:04 →Conejo Climate Coalition member supported the all-electric, climate-friendly design and the affordable units.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:07:07 →Questioned the need for a hotel given area vacancies and suggested a four-story residential-only alternative.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:12:00 →TO Arts board treasurer voiced strong support for anchoring the development around the theater complex.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:14:03 →CLU employee supported the project as reinvestment for future generations.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:15:02 →Recent retiree questioned whether the modest tax revenue justifies changing the city's character, and asked if this was the last chance to comment.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:20:10 →Briefly voiced strong support for the project.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:23:04 →TO Arts vice chair, speaking as a resident, urged the commission to shape the city's change, citing his son's inability to afford living here.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:23:06 →Born-and-raised young resident supported the project, citing declining housing production and school enrollment.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:26:28 →15-year resident opposed, urging the city to fill existing empty storefronts first and citing the wildfire evacuation occurring the same day.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:27:57 →27-year-old construction worker wished his friends who left for affordable housing could come back.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:30:31 →Newbury Park resident who cannot afford to live independently spoke via Zoom in strong support, saying the project excites his generation.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:32:01 →Ventura County YIMBY housing advocate spoke via Zoom in support of the 240 units and walkable downtown core.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:33:42 →Spoke via Zoom in support, saying families need a real gathering place and praising the community investment.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:38:30 →25-year-old resident spoke via Zoom in support, saying the project would give his generation reasons to stay.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:42:39 →Small business owner and Chamber boardmember spoke via Zoom in support, saying the project keeps the charm while reinvesting.
Planning Commission Regular Meeting - May 18, 2026 · 3:44:30 →